goodness. it's a beer koozie with breasts. a concept that debuted at the holiday wonderland hooter's. and available at boobsie.com. no need to thank me. i'm here to help. it's part of my mission. so when you gather with your friends and family, remember to appreciate what you have and give to those less fortunate because every time a bell rings, a stripper gets her wings. it is, indeed, a wonderful life on the "ridiculist." that's it for us. thanks for watching. "outfront" next, breaking news on north korea's launch of a long-range rocket. what we're learning about just how much control the country has over that satellite. plus, erin burnett has an exclusive interview with defense secretary, leon panetta about this launch. she also talks with him about syria, what we're learning tonight about the forces loyal to president bashar al assad,

and how scud missiles have been fired. the united states government says it shows just how desperate assad's regime is now getting. and also, our first look at the shooter who police believe is responsible for last night's deadly rampage in a portland-area mall. police have identified him as well as the two people that he killed. let's go "outfront." good evening, everyone. i'm ashleigh banfield in for erin burnett tonight who is on assignment in afghanistan. we've got breaking news right off the top. cnn just learning that the united states does not believe that north korea is in full control of that satellite that it sent into space with the long-range rocket launch. this is according to a u.s. official to our barbara starr at the pentagon. up until now, by most accounts, this launch has been seen as a

success, or certainly it raised the bar on how we view their capabilities. erin burnett spoke with defense secretary leon panetta, exclusively in kabul about this very issue. take a look. >> mr. secretary, thank you so much for taking the time. >> good to be with you, erin. >> i wanted to start by asking you about north korea. i know, obviously, they've had failures with rocket launches and eight months ago they failed. now they've had a success. and i'm wondering if you know how they fixed it or whether they might have had help from another country? >> we have no idea. as a matter of fact, we're still assessing just exactly what happened here to look at each of the stages and determine whether or not it really was a success or not. but, you know, the fact that they've launched this missile is a clear provocation. we've warned them not toot it. we've been very concerned about their firing this missile. in violation of every international standard and rule. and, you know, it's clear that have one of the reasons we're rebalancing in the pacific is to deal with the threat from north korea.

and we will. we're prepared to do that. we will respond if we have to. >> how will we respond? does this mean they could hit the united states? >> no, the fact is that we do have a very strong missile defense that would be able to guard against that kind of potential and -- >> so we would be able to stop it if it were coming in? >> i'm very confident that we would be able to do that. obviously, the hope is that we never have to face that kind of threat, and that's why we continue to warn them against this kind of provocation. because, you know, frankly, it doesn't help the situation in korea. it just creates a greater provocation, not only towards the united states, but towards south korea. and the result is that tensions increase there and it makes the concern about some kind of miscalculation that much greater. >> and there was one thing you

said. you said you weren't -- you were still determining whether it was a success or not. is that still something that the u.s. is not sure about? >> no, i think we still have to assess just exactly what happened here. track, you know -- we had radar tracking the flight of that, to be able to analyze exactly what happened during the course of that flight, the various stages. and then most importantly, the final stage, to determine really whether or not that did work effectively, or whether it tumbled into space. i mean, that's the issue that we need to assess. >> and we will have more from erin's interview with secretary panetta a little later on in the program. but i want to bring in james spyder marks, retired u.s. army general, who served as a senior intelligence officer in korea, and also victor cha, who served as director of asian affairs in the white house from 2004 to 2007, where he was responsible for coordinating u.s. policy for north korea.

spyder, let me begin with you. the secretary is not necessarily calling this a success. barbara starr is reporting that the u.s. doesn't think that korea has any control out of this, short of saying it's tumbling out of control, they're not in full control. does that matter? is this splitting hairs or semantics, or is this really still quite a leg that they have now up in this battle? >> i think it's significant that they were able to establish the capability of launching a three-stage rocket. i think we will determine whether they were able to put a tip or at least some form of a satellite into an orbit and then what's it doing up there, at this point, is not significant. we shouldn't worry that that was an armed or a nuclearized or a weaponized tip. i think they just wanted, primarily, to establish the ability to launch it into an extra atmospheric type of orbit, and they were able to do that with a three-stage rocket. the real concern that we would have is how do they weaponize that. but this clearly is a provocation against all u.n. resolutions.

>> it's a big difference, weaponizing with wmds or nukes. and maybe, victor, just weigh in on that. if there is this suspicion and if it bears any truth, that iran may have actually helped this process along, does that not equate to iran would be willing to help the process along in terms of nuclear warheads as well? >> that's entirely a possibility as well, ashleigh. i think that the relationship between iran and north korea, when it comes to this missile business, has been quite deep, quite robust. every iranian missile of the shahab design, from one through four, have all been north korean missiles. so there's a real history of cooperation there. and i would imagine that it would continue. with regard to whether this thing is a satellite or whatever it is, if the north koreans don't have control of it, that, to me, would not be that surprising, because they really don't have a full-fledged space program. they just disguise this as a space launch, but as the general

said, this is clearly for a military application, before it is for a civilian application. >> and let me jump back to you, general marks, about the issue of, the tactics. tactically, they really can't do much to us. i think you have said before, we can defend against a no-warning missile attack here in the united states, so why is this such a big deal, or is it? >> well, it is a big deal. they have not done this before. they've had a couple of launches, you know, about 15 years ago, they launched a rocket over japan. it was a surprise to most of us. that occurred just before i took over as the senior intel guy in korea. and we've been watching these developments very, very closely. this is a big deal. ashleigh, this is a big deal. but the arrangement along the peninsula was established close to 50 years ago, as a result of the cold war, and what we need to do, as victor has indicated, is we've got to change the dynamic here. iran is very much a part of the discussion, but not included in what we know as the six-party talks, which are russia, china,

north korea, south korea, the united states, and japan. we need to try to change the dynamics here, so that there isn't this provocation, because what you have along the peninsula is quite stark. you have this incredibly robust and modern south korea and this stark, dark nation directly across the dmz. >> victor, who does have influence over pyongyang? >> well, i think for many years, we believed it was the chinese. the chinese are the primary source of food and economic assistance, energy assistance to north korea. but then, again, the chinese had a high-level visit to north korea the day before that they announced that they were going to do this missile launch. so, even the chinese, i think, are quite frustrated. but at the same time, i would imagine that they're also not willing to completely abandon the north koreans, because they don't want to see instability in the north, which would then suggest instability along their border. and that is something they don't want to see. so china is really the country that has the most influence, and yet it's very difficult to move them to a place where the united states, japan, south korea, the

other members of the six-party talks would like china to go, which is to put more pressure on the north, such that they stop these sorts of provocations and stop their missile and nuclear programs. >> all right, victor cha and spyder marks, thank you to you both for your perspective on this tonight. do appreciate it. "outfront" next, with just 20 days until the fiscal cliff, both sides are saying very little about progress, which is really what everybody wants. so you would think the ranking member of the senate budget committee knows a thing or two about what's going on, right? you'd be thinking wrong. republican jeff sessions comes out front tonight. also, how far is too far when you're interviewing someone on a sensitive topic? barbara walters asks governor chris christie if he is too fat for the job of president. john avalon's going to weigh in on this one with a little bit of historical perspective. also, a new twist in the very bizarre story about john mcafee. the internet tycoon has now left guatemala. police want to question him about a murder in belize, but

that is not where he's headed. details, next. still runny. [ male announcer ] truth is, dayquil doesn't treat that. really? [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus fights your worst cold symptoms, plus it relieves your runny nose. [ breathes deeply ] awesome. [ male announcer ] yes, it is. that's the cold truth!

[ male announcer ] yes, it is. meet the 5-passenger ford c-max hybrid. when you're carrying a lot of weight, c-max has a nice little trait, you see, c-max helps you load your freight, with its foot-activated lift gate. but that's not all you'll see, cause c-max also beats prius v, with better mpg. say hi to the all-new 47 combined mpg c-max hybrid. aunt sally's singing again. it's a tradition, honey. [ singing christmas carols ] mmmm. [ female announcer ] maknew traditions with pillsbury grands! cinnamon rolls.

[ female announcer ] maknew traditions try running four.ning a restaurant is hard, fortunately we've got ink. it gives us 5x the rewards on our internet, phone charges and cable, plus at office supply stores. rewards we put right back into our business. this is the only thing we've ever wanted to do and ink helps us do it. make your mark with ink from chase. woman: what do you mean, homeowners insurance doesn't cover floods? [ heart rate increases ] man: a few inches of water caused all this? [ heart rate increases ] woman #2: but i don't even live near the water. what you don't know about flood insurance may shock you -- including the fact that a preferred risk policy starts as low as $129 a year. for an agent, call the number that appears on your screen.

our second story "outfront," getting out the vote. you know, there's just nothing like being an american citizen. you can say what's on your mind and you get to vote, or do you? because according to the census bureau, 60 million people failed to vote in 2008 because they weren't registered. some people had moved or were unaware of the deadline to register, because it's quite a bit before the election. they also apparently were quite discouraged by the complex registration procedures. so, because of that, attorney general eric holder has a solution for our voting system.

in a speech last night that really largely went unnoticed, he said this. "automatically register every eligible voter in america and enable their registration to move when they do." so is this an obvious solution or is this the government going too far? "outfront" tonight, political analyst roland martin and david fromme, senior adviser to president bush. david, i know you've written extensively about this. on its surface, that just sounds terrific. just make it easier for every red-blooded american citizen to be able to vote. but i know you say this is kind of just far too small of a solution. why? >> right. america has a uniquely ram shackle voting. it's injurious to the national pride to hear that brazil does it better, but brazil does it better, and so does mexico. so what i'm disappointed in from the attorney general is there are a lot of problems. he's picked one. it's an important problem. but it also happens to be a

problem, the fixing of which would benefit his party. because probably the younger people, the less -- the more mobile people, who would be benefited, would tend to vote democrat. which is fine. democrats should vote too. but if you're going to fix it, do a real fix. don't simply introduce something that is advantageous to one party, as if it's a complete solution, when there are so many problems that need to be fixed together, as was recommended by the post-recount reform commissions in 2002. >> okay, i'm sorry, first of all, ashleigh -- >> you're not even going to wait for the question, are you, roland? >> i'm sorry, i can't. i'm trying to figure out. only democrats somehow move? this is not a democrat or a republican thing. i've covered city government, i've covered county government. i'll tell you as someone who has watched this nonsense happen, it is ridiculous. the problem in this country is that we have 50 different rules because it's done by state. then once you go in those 50 states, then you have different counties. part of the problem, you have federal elections, congressional races, senatorial races, presidential race, and then you

have your state and local race. this is the start of -- a starting point, if you will. so if attorney general eric holder had come out with eight or ten different ideas, folks would have been going nuts saying, no, that's too much. it's a way to begin the process, because it is convoluted, in some places, ashleigh, it's so crazy. if you literally move from one apartment, right next-door to the next one, your voter registration is ineligible. that's how crazy it is. >> david, let me ask you this. you suggest that voter registration is just one little plank in a big problem. and yet so many people, within hours and the next days after the election, suggested that president obama may have won this election because he had a better ground game. he was able to get out there in the community, register voters, et cetera. so eric holder's solution would theoretically even the playing field for republican. that's got to be palatable. >> no, it probably wouldn't. because republicans tend to be more registered.

democrats always need a better ground game, because their voters, younger, poorer, more mobile are more likely to fall off the registration polls. let me give you a concrete example of the kind of problem the attorney general does not address. the election of 2000, there was a big messup in the voting in the city of st. louis. there were lines that went -- that were not yet discharged a to the time of the -- that was appointed for the end of the voting. the local -- very democratic city, st. louis, in a crucial state, missouri. local democrats went to an elected judge, a political official, and asked that judge to extend voting hours. in no other democracy in the world does that kind of decision get made by an elected official, who comes from one party or the other. everybody else has some kind of national electoral commission, has nonpartisan officers. throughout the united states, it's done in a political way. you have to fix all of these problems, or else -- by the way, none of them will work, because if it is seen to tilt to one side, nothing will happen. >> david, you're talking about a line.

we're talking about just getting people to the line. and that is what i'm saying. again, you're absolutely right. it's a broad issue that we have here. lots of problems, but one of the fundamental problems is when you have different registration dates. when you start to talk about different criteria in one state compared to the others, in terms of what you need, the beginning process is to, first of all, get people registered. i think the attorney general is talking about the most basic fundamental issue, and that is affirming the right to vote for every american. what you're talking about is later in the process. let's just get them registered, first. >> and i have to leave it there, although this conversation, there is certainly more to it than that. roland martin, david fromme, thank you both. do appreciate it. and "outfront" next, chris christie is asked if he is too fat to be president. which questions, if any, should be off-limits?

>> i think it's a fair question to ponder and i don't think it's a legitimate to run for president. they are going to make

ultimately it's about job performance. people in the country have seen him respond to hurricane sandy, working around the clock, and he's done by all accounts an exemplary job. that's what matters. that's the key criteria. >> you're right. >> but will some people take it as a style point? sure. but it's not the real substance. >> way outside the style of all of this. there is facts behind this. the national institutes of health say if you're about 5'11" and weigh 215 pounds, you're considered obese. and the risks that are scientifically associated with being obese are severe. i mean, blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, gallstones, breathing problems, certain cancers. that's unavoidable, those are realities. and that, by the way, are just at obese. there are other statistics for being even heavier than that, and chris christie's never said how heavy he is, but isn't that a concern for the leader of the free world to be at risk for this many more diseases than the average guy? >> it's a concern, but the american people would have to take that into account. and if he decides to run for

president, you'll probably see an attempt to lose weight, probably for style reasons. but he's proven the ability to do the job. the job performance is there. >> yes, he has. he has shown a lot of people that he's great at what he does. that's not the disputed issue here. let me ask you about your incredible acumen in the history of presidents. give me some background. we never used to talk about this stuff. this was off-limits completely with our historical presidents. and there were some serious health concerns with a number of them. >> absolutely. we've had some seriously large mammals as presidents before too. william howard taft, famously, a very large guy. grover cleveland before him. so this isn't unprecedented territory. let's not pretend that it is. more important than someone's weight or even what health concerns they have is probably their age. and chris christie is just 50 years old. so while he absolutely should, in a matter of health, get himself in better shape, we've had presidents elected with far more serious health problems, polio, fdr, adson's disease, jfk. >> woodrow wilson had a stroke

and the entire nation did not know his wife was running the country? >> effectively, yes. in his second term, wilson had a stroke and his wife was running the country. we've dealt with health problems in presidents before. this is obvious. no one is going to be surprised that this is an issue. >> but we're in an age of demanding to know everything and reality tv. >> we have a fascination with 2016 and a fascination with superficial appearances, when really this job is about substance and performance. >> john avalon, getting to the heart of the matter. appreciate it. and "outfront" next, just 23 days away from the fiscal cliff and we're still seeing the wheeling and the dealing, behind closed doors, though. one senior republican senator says he has had enough of all the secrecy and he's coming outfront with us to talk about it. plus, some new details in that portland area mall shooting. we're going to give you a first look at the man that police say was responsible. ife. you won't take our future.

aids affects us all. even babies. chevron is working to stop mother-to-child transmission. our employees and their families are part of the fight. and we're winning. at chevron nigeria, we haven't had a reported case in 12 years. aids is strong. aids is strong. but we are stronger. and aids... ♪ aids is going to lose. aids is going to lose. ♪ it's lots of things. all waking up. connecting to the global phenomenon we call the internet of everything. ♪ it's going to be amazing. and exciting. and maybe, most remarkably, not that far away. we're going to wake the world up. and watch, with eyes wide, as it gets to work. cisco. tomorrow starts here.

♪ [ male announcer ] this is karen and jeremiah. they don't know it yet, but they're gonna fall in love, get married, have a couple of kids, [ children laughing ] move to the country, and live a long, happy life together where they almost never fight about money. [ dog barks ] because right after they get married, they'll find some retirement people who are paid on salary, not commission. they'll get straightforward guidance and be able to focus on other things, like each other, which isn't rocket science. it's just common sense. from td ameritrade.

welcome back to the second

welcome back to the second half of "outfront." i'm ashleigh banfield in for bern burnett, who's on assignment in afghanistan. we start the second half hour with stories that we care about. internet typhoon, john mcafee, who was on the run for weeks, now appears to be back in the united states after being released and deported from guatemala this morning. guatemalan officials tell cnn that he boarded a flight bound for miami this afternoon and according to flight records, that plane has landed. international criminal defense lawyer douglas mcmahon says the only way that mcafee could be considered for extradition to belize instead was if authorities had charged him with

a crime. but so far, mcafee is only wanted for questioning in the death of his neighbor, but not charged with hit. venezuelan president hugo chavez is recovering in a cuban hospital after a six-hour surgery to treat cancer. the type of cancer remains unknown, but chavez's recovery will be complex and difficult and has asked venezuelans to pray for their leader. chavez's illness was first reported 18 months ago and he's had at least two operations since that time. on saturday, the leader announced that the cancer had returned. the federal reserve has announced that it's going to keep short-term interest rates near zero, at least as long as unemployment remains above 6.5%.

tonight, unemployment is at 7.7%, and jim beyanco, who follows the fed, told us that he believes it's going to be well into 2014 or even 2015 before we get to that 6.5% unemployment rate. the fed has also said that it will extend its program to buy $45 billion in treasuries, every month, in addition to its existing policy of buying $40 billion in mortgage-backed securities each month. it's been 496 days since the u.s. lost its top credit rating. what are we doing to get it back? well, fed chair ben bernanke warns that we're already paying the price for teetering on the edge of this fiscal cliff and he points to a recent drop in consumer and business confidence and says he hopes that congress will do the right thing and not kick the can down the road. so that brings us to our fourth story, outfront. deal, no deal? deal, no deal? it is not a howie mandell story. it has everything to do about the fiscal cliff. and it's happening behind closed doors. and what is said in public does not seem to clear anything up. >> the longer the white house slow walks this discussion, the closer our economy gets to the fiscal cliff, and the more american jobs are placed in jeopardy.

>> so what's really going on behind the scenes? earlier i spoke with republican senator jeff sessions, who's been asking the same question, and i asked him how much he, as the ranking member of the senate budget committee, actually knows about what's going on. >> very little. almost nothing, frankly. i mean, i learned from sources that the speaker was disappointed and things were not moving forward as well as he seemed to have indicated right there in those public remarks.

but otherwise, really, we don't know. and the people that are losing in this process, this secret process, are the american people. they'll be the ones asked to pay more taxes. they may be the ones that are asked to tighten their belts. and they need to know what the choices are and what we're wrestling with. and they need to know how their congressmen and senators stand and feels about these issues. and i really think the classic understanding of the way congress should operate is being undermined, because we're not having committees, we're not having amendments, we're not having votes, we're not having debates, we're just sitting here, waiting for the president and the speaker to tell us what to do, apparently. >> i think a lot of people are gob smacked, hearing that from someone of your ilk, you're the ranking member of the senate budget committee. it does sound like you're pretty rankled by this whole process, but it also sounds like you're a bit upset with your republican leadership. >> first of all, it's driven by harry reid. he refused to bring up a budget, to bring up a single appropriations bill. >> but you just mentioned speaker boehner. >> well, i was going to get to that. he's driven this process, and about the only thing the republicans could have done would be to protest it, and

fight harder about it. and we have, but i don't think effectively enough. and we've now, at the end, fallen into this trap, i would suggest on of just having secret negotiations. i really wish we could have avoided it. but this was the strategy of the democratic leadership in the senate, and they carried it out for almost three years -- over two years now. >> all right, you said in your op-ed today, and i want to quote you directly. you said, in part, washington has become possessed by the idea that a small group of negotiators, meeting in secret, can solve the deep, painful, and systemic problems plaguing this country with a single grand bargain, produced at the 59th minute of the 11th hour. this is a siren song. i suppose the question would be then, what makes you think, senator, that a larger group of lawmakers, say congress, would be able to do any better, given the unbearable gridlock that you all have been in, and given the fact that gallup has polled you all at 10% favorability. what makes you think you can do better? >> ashleigh, i think, had we been debating for the last two years openly and honestly, the

very difficult choices this country faces, the threat we have over us from the debt, the american, and we've done so intelligently and effectively, and our members are capable of that, i believe the american people would have a better -- >> but senator, i think there are a lot of people who disagree with you and say, open and wonderful debate, sure, but the filibuster stops a lot of that from happening, and that the vote, ultimately, no matter how wonderful you orators are, ends up being right along party lines. >> well, look. after you voted and voted and voted, pretty soon you get exhausted, right? pretty soon everybody who advocates one view, that can't be successfully won by votes, has to begin to think that a compromise is appropriate. and our leaders, at that point, i think it would be appropriate for them to try to bring people together to reach an agreement. but you have to understand, that we've not really had a national discussion about these big issues, have we? we've not brought it up in our committees. no budget has been laid out. directly not laid out by budget, because the democratic leadership didn't want to discuss it. >> so, senator, the polling -- >> i'm just telling you, that's the fact. i'm not exaggerating. it was a strategy executed, not to publicly debate and have votes on the great issue of our time. >> well, no matter what happens, there seems to be gridlock. whether it's the big process or the little process at this point. senator, delighted to talk to you. thank you so much. have a wonderful holiday. >> thank you, ashleigh. we are now getting our first

glimpses of the man police say went on a deadly shooting spree in a mall crowded with christmas shoppers outside of portland, oregon, yesterday. investigators say 22-year-old jacob tyler roberts acted alone when he allegedly squeezed off at least 20 shots, sending thousands of shoppers running for their lives. we're also hearing police dispatch audio from those horrifying moments. >> just confirming you said an p yh,he'se rsn pthat's sg tha people. >> we're out here on foot and there are people bailing out like crazy from everywhere. >> cnn's kyung lah is outside of the clackamas town center, and that's what you were just hearing about on that audio recording. kyung, we're piecing together all of this information, bit by bit, including that the gunman initially tried to flee in the middle of all of this volley of gunfire, and that he was also yelling out to witnesses, that he was the shooter. but what are we finding out about maybe the most important

element, motive. why did this happen? >> reporter: it's very, very difficult to know right now. police themselves are saying, look, we just don't know. we don't know what the motive is. we don't have much of a criminal history on this man. in fact, he really wasn't on the radar at all for police. when you talk to his family, we reached out to his mother and family friends, what they say is, there were no apparent warning signs. you think back to the colorado movie shooting, to virginia

tech. there were significant signs, but in this case, his family and his friends are saying, they just didn't see it. they thought of him as a normal 22-year-old boy, a family friend saying he was just a good boy. the only sign that we saw, ashleigh, of perhaps a fascination with guns is when we looked at his facebook page. there is a picture of a man firing a handgun, it appears to be him. so there appears to be some fascination with guns. but at this point, that's really the only apparent sign right now. >> you know, the remarkable fact here was that there was somewhere around 10,000 people, 10,000 people in that mall at the time. so despite the fact that two people were shot dead, including the gunman, who shot himself dead, and one was injured, you would think that the toll would

be much, much higher. what happened? >> reporter: absolutely. you think about what any american mall looks like during this time, when it's packed with shoppers, the fact that there were only two, and while it's certainly very difficult for these families, it's incredibly lucky. what police are saying is that the gun jammed early on. that was a lucky stroke. when he started firing, the gun jammed very early. when he was in the food court. but then there were other things that police did tactically. police no longer wait for s.w.a.t. to get in place. because of the lessons that

they've learned, from columbine, from virginia tech. they move in as quickly as possible. they don't wait for s.w.a.t. they move in. the other thing is, you mentioned, ashleigh, those 10,000 people inside the shopping mall, they stayed cool. they reached out. they helped each other. they dragged people in. ts in th. ts in th. professor sargent, can you tell me what cd rates will be in two years? no. if he can't, no one can. that's why ally has a raise your rate cd. ally bank. your money needs an ally. neural speeds increasing to 4g lte.

brain upgrading to a quad-core processor. predictive intelligence with google now complete. introducing droid dna by htc. it's not an upgrade to your phone. it's an upgrade to yourself. how they'll live tomorrow. for more than 116 years, ameriprise financial has worked for their clients' futures. helping millions of americans retire on their terms. when they want. where they want. doing what they want.

ameriprise. the strength of a leader in retirement planning. the heart of 10,000 advisors working with you one-to-one. together for your future. ♪ constipated? yeah. mm. some laxatives like dulcolax can cause cramps. but phillips' caplets don't. they have magnesium. for effective relief of occasional constipation. thanks. [ phillips' lady ] live the regular life. phillips'.

we are back with tonight's outer circle, where we reach out to our sources all around the world. and we want to start in sudan's darfur region. that's where the government officials there say that a captured vulture is part of an israeli spy mission. nema al bagger is following the story for us. and i asked her, just what evidence do the sudanese officials have to give their claim any support. >> ashleigh, after that deadly strike on the sudanese weapons factory back in october, which sudan blamed on israel, it did look like relations between the two countries couldn't get any worse but it appears this, in

fact, can. the griffin vulture migrates en route through israel and the ecologists have been tagging the bird for years, but when a bird fell to earth in sudan's western darfur region, local authorities were a bit perturbed to find hebrew righting and a tracker on the wing and promptly declared to the local press that the gps tracking devices were clearly the latest in mossad spyware. we have no word on the bird's current whereabouts. ashleigh? >> bashar al assad fired four scud range missiles at rebel fighters today according to u.s. officials. there's no word on what kind of damage they inflicted. but the escalation of fighting comes as the u.s. and allies closely monitor syria's chemical weapons. erin burnett sat down with leon panetta in afghanistan and she asked about those weapons. >> i think there's a danger here based on there were, in fact, beginning to assemble these weapons and that -- and put them together. and when you do that, you know, that's a dangerous sign that the next step is to use them. and so that's why we issue the warning that we did, made clear that there would be consequences. at least at this point the intelligence on this issue has kind of leveled off. but my concern is this.

that as the opposition continues to move against the regime, particularly as they move towards damascus, that if the regime feels that it's in danger of collapsing, that it might very well resort to these kinds of weapons. that's what concerns me the most. >> you know, everyone has said that syria is a chemical superpower used to describe them, is the sarin gas, the nerve agent and what these things can do. but how good is our intelligence? how much do you really know about what syria really has? >> well, we've been closely monitoring the situation with cpw for a long time. from the very beginning of this war that's gone on in syria, one of our great concerns was the location of the cpw sites and whether they were secure and what was happening with them. and we've been in very close collaboration with the adjoining countries, turkey, jordan, israel, all concerned that cpw not fall into the wrong hands. we are monitoring it as best we can. i can't say that it's 100% but we usually have pretty good intelligence about some of the things that are happening. but this -- you know, let me put it this way. i think we would have pretty good intelligence if, in fact, they made the decision to go ahead and try to use this. >> and what would you do if they

did? would that be something that would involve -- former joint chief said to me that that would involve ground troops. it would be a situation where the u.s. might have to consider that. >> well, i'm not going to go into the options because obviously the president would have to decide what steps we would take in that situation. he's made very clear that there are going to be consequences. we develop plans that we can present to the president if that situation occurs. and then the president would have to make the decision with steps we would take to try to hopefully prevent that from happening. >> so you would give him the option -- ground troops would be among the ones that you present? >> there would be a series but i don't want to go into the particular of what they would be. >> this comes with the same week that he designated part of the opposition one specific group a terrorist group. how do you know after so many months saying we don't want to arm them or get involved because we don't know who they are but now we seem to know so clearly. >> well, one of the things that we've made an effort at trying to do is to be able to identify those elements of the opposition that we believe can represent the kind of leadership that ultimately can provide political transformation should the assad regime go down, as we expect it will.

so over the last number of months we've made an effort to identify, you know, who in the opposition represents that kind of leadership and to also identify those elements that we obviously don't support that involve al qaeda or al qaeda influenced. and that's what we identified yesterday. so the effort now is to assure that the opposition group that we support and that can bring a legitimate opposition together to transform government there is the one that we fully support. >> it seems ironic and it has to be difficult for you since obviously you're supporting some

groups but there was an al qaeda-linked group wanting to get rid of bashar al assad. we helped kuwaiti in that goal. is it strange, in a sense, that we're fighting for the same thing al qaeda is? >> it's the nature of what's happening in the middle east now, that as you have the arab spring occur, there are going to be very legitimate groups that want to be able to pursue a political transition to real democracy, to freedom, to all of the liberties and rights that we enjoy. so there are those groups. there are those that will try to take advantage of it. extremist groups that will say, wait a minute, we don't want to ned that direction. we want to use this as an opportunity to promote extremism. that is what is happening in part of libya. it's happening in syria. and our goal is to try to work with those that really want to pursue legitimate political reform, try to support them in their effort as opposed to trying to in any way get al qaeda to exert any kind of influence. and it's tough. it's not easy. there are extreme groups in these countries but i think deep

down people want to enjoy the kind of rights and freedoms that we have in this country and i think ultimately that will prevail.

so there are those groups. there are those that will try to take advantage of it. extremist groups that will say, wait a minute, we don't want to ned that direction. we want to use this as an opportunity to promote extremism. that is what is happening in part of libya. it's happening in syria. and our goal is to try to work with those that really want to pursue legitimate political reform, try to support them in their effort as opposed to trying to in any way get al qaeda to exert any kind of influence. and it's tough. it's not easy. there are extreme groups in these countries but i think deep down people want to enjoy the kind of rights and freedoms that we have in this country and i think ultimately that will prevail.

>> erin burnett with the secretary of defense. tomorrow, erin burnett outfront is live from afghanistan and she's got a special preview of tomorrow's show from kabul. years ago, my doctor told me to take a centrum silver multivitamin every day. i told him, sure. can't hurt, right? then i heard this news about a multivitamin study looking at long-term health benefits for men over 50. the one they used in that study... centrum silver. that's what i take. my doctor!

he knows his stuff. [ male announcer ] centrum. the most recommended. most preferred. most studied. centrum, always your most complete. ♪ hark how the bells, sweet silver bells ♪ ♪ all seem to say throw care away ♪ ♪ from everywhere, filling the air ♪ [ female announcer ] chex party mix. easy 15-minute homemade recipes you just pop in a microwave. like caramel chocolate drizzles. happier holidays. chex party mix. [ sniffs ] i took dayquil but my nose is still runny. [ male announcer ] truth is, dayquil doesn't treat that. really? [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus fights your worst cold symptoms, plus it relieves your runny nose. [ breathes deeply ] awesome. [ male announcer ] yes, it is. that's the cold truth!

[ male announcer ] yes, it is. try running four.ning a restaurant is hard, fortunately we've got ink. it gives us 5x the rewards on our internet, phone charges and cable, plus at office supply stores. rewards we put right back into our business. this is the only thing we've ever wanted to do and ink helps us do it. make your mark with ink from chase.

tomorrow, erin burnett outfront is live from afghanistan and she's got a special preview of tomorrow's show from kabul. >> good evening from kabul. i'm here in afghanistan. tomorrow we have a special report live "outfront," daily live in kabul is hectic. people, traffic, animals. it is chaotic and everywhere you look there are armed men. the afghan nag police are supposed to be taking over control but they are struggling, at least from what we saw, to handle some simple things, like traffic control. will they be ready when the u.s. troops leave? that's a critical question and one we're trying to get answers to. and after the longest war in american history, when will american troops leave and when they do, what happens? we're going to get answers to

those questions in our exclusive interview with secretary of defense, leon panetta. and you're going to be meeting these girls. they are just 14 month apart and these girls have big, big dreams. they are pretty inspirational. we're going to share it with you and we're going to ask you the question, what is the future as girls going to be when the american troops go home. all of that tomorrow live from kabul. a difference in the lives of others. let's get started at capella.edu

i tell them dentures are very different to real teeth. they're about 10 times softer and may have surface pores where bacteria can grow and multiply. polident is specifically designed to clean dentures daily. its unique micro-clean formula kills 99.9% of odor causing bacteria and helps dissolve stains, cleaning in a better way than brushing with toothpaste. that's why i recommend using polident. [ male announcer ] polident. cleaner, fresher, brighter every day. but they haven't experienced extra strength bayer advanced aspirin. in fact, in a recent survey, 95% of people who tried it agreed that it relieved their headache fast. visit fastreliefchallenge.com today for a special trial offer.

and his new boss told him two things -- cook what you love, and save your money. joe doesn't know it yet, but he'll work his way up from busser to waiter to chef before opening a restaurant specializing in fish and game from the great northwest. he'll start investing early, he'll find some good people to help guide him, and he'll set money aside from his first day of work to his last, which isn't rocket science. it's just common sense. from td ameritrade. ashleigh? mmmm. [ female announcer ] make new traditions with pillsbury grands! cinnamon rolls.